Sealed in your browser
Your claim and excerpts are encrypted to an attested intake enclave before they leave the page.
Paid private claim checkIndependent review.
Independent review.
Evidence you can inspect.
Disagreement on the record.
Thrice checks claims about crypto and AI before you share them. You bring the claim and its sources; three attested AI jurors read the same evidence, and you see an outcome only when all three agree.
What we doOne claim.
One claim.
Three jurors who must agree.
Thrice checks one factual claim at a time against the source excerpts you provide. A paid private check costs from $0.10 USDG on Robinhood Chain; network gas is paid separately.
Read by three models
Qwen 3.6, Gemma 4 and GPT-OSS 120B review through attested confidential inference.
Checked against the chain
The result is encrypted to your key; your browser checks it against the answer hash on chain.
Agreement shows that three models read the same evidence the same way; it does not prove that the claim or the source is correct. Human panels are not available at launch.
Independent by designStrict by default.
Strict by default.
Honest when unsure.
HUNG is the result when jurors do not agree; no outcome is presented. Each juror must quote its evidence verbatim.
AI jurors at launch.
Qwen 3.6, Gemma 4 and GPT-OSS 120B, run through attested Phala confidential inference.
3jurors per check
Agreement required.
All three jurors must agree on one outcome.
100%or the result is HUNG
Largest jury size.
Configurable later. Every check at launch uses 3 jurors.
9seats, at most
Seven document schemas are specified for the initial release: ex-dividend, stock split, earnings, reserve attestation, net asset value, invoice and freeform fact.
Who it is for
Document intelligence for accountable decisions.
Builders
Evaluate structured document findings. Inspect source evidence and model readings. Test the sample workflow.
Open the dashboard →Protocols
Explore standing document feeds and their fail-closed update rules.
Read the docs →Researchers
Examine field-level agreement, quoted evidence and what a single dissent changes in the illustrative case study.
Explore the case study →